Dear Sir. Or Madam. Or, y’know, whatever. Does it matter? For many people, it matters a lot. Ellen Barry, a London-based correspondent for the New York Times, filed this March 2019 report detailing a British newspaper’s controversy around the proper form of addressing letters to the editor. Lest you think that only the Brits would care about this issue, be sure to read the comments to Barry’s article, which come from readers in Finland, Germany, Australia, Mexico, France, Colombia, and the UK, as well as many US locations.
Barry, “To sir, with wrath: A cautionary tale from Middle England”
- Barry reports on the reactions of a British weekly newspaper’s readers to a change in the paper’s policy regarding the form of address for letters to the editor. Readers of Barry’s New York Times report also voice their concerns and opinions in the comments following the report. Snarky attempts at humor abound in both the comments to the Standardquoted in Barry’s article as well as the comments of New York Times readers. What other opinions or arguments show up in both sets of comments? Cite examples to support your observations.
- Suppose you had a job that involved receiving formal letters from people who did not know your name or gender. Which form of address, among all the ones mentioned in Barry’s article and its comments, would you prefer? Which would you like least? Why? Explain your responses.
- Skim through the 55 comments on Barry’s article. Very few of them have a specific They Say, presumably because the writers are commenting on the article in general. Two of the commenters, however—James (Boston) and Jomo (San Diego)—do address a specific passage. Do either (or both) of these comments follow the advice given in Chapter 13 of your text for entering online conversations? Point to passages from the chapter to support your conclusions.
- Gender is one of the considerations for forms of address such as ‘sir’ and ‘madam’ (along with age, status, and level of formality), but there are other terms that can be discussed and debated, particularly in terms of everyday spoken language. For example, can “you guys” refer to a group of women? Only men? A mixed group? A group that includes non-binary people? What about “dude”? Men and boys only or nah? No doubt you can answer those questions in the snap of your fingers, but wait; forms of address in conversation are often so automatic that we don’t notice our own speech habits. Spend a day or two listening to and observing what you say and what you hear, then write an essay that details your ideas and your practice of forms of address with your peers, with people older or younger than you, people you know and people you don’t. Include Barry and/or her commenters as your They Say.
I truly loved Tankylosaur's comment:
"Why not try the old Scottish phrase, 'Dear Sir or Madman'?"
A bit of levity goes a long way in discussions of policing sexism in language. This is not to say that sexism in language is OK. Eliminating sexism in any way we can is good. But we can not just tell people not to be sexist (or racist). We have to show them and make sure our institutions are free of sexism. Language, alas, is not an institution.
Posted by: cathryn amdahl | 03/14/2019 at 01:14 PM
I think "To Whom It May Concern" or "Dear (Insert position of whom you sending a letter to)" can also be appropriate. They are both professional and don't assume the gender of the reader. This only shows whomever you are sending a letter to that you are professional and that you are considerate of their preferences.
Posted by: breanna mcghee | 03/21/2019 at 09:04 PM
In my opinion, the person sending the letter should research who they are sending it to. If the gender is unknown, people should address it with a gender neutral noun. We learn in school to write letters and addressing them with Dear Mr.,Ms., or Mrs. depending on your audience. Therefore, "sir" should not be used in all cases.If you know the editor is male, then by all means, use "sir". The issue should not be controversial if writers consider their audience or gender of the person they are sending the letter to.
Posted by: Carmen A. | 04/17/2019 at 04:41 PM
My view is that it's easier to just use a gender neutral form of address, such as "To whom it may concern", in the first place, just to make things easier. There's much less of a risk of offending someone, and you don't need to research who you're sending it to. It's still respectful, but its much simpler.
Posted by: Stephanie W. | 04/18/2019 at 02:21 AM
In my opinion, we can use Sir/Madam when addressing someone in a letter. There is nothing wrong with it. If you do not know their gender, it is some kind of respect. We can also use, "To whom it may concern", which is probably the best option. It is easy to respect people and it is easy to adopt gender neutral expressions and we should use them now, because we do not know who we can offend.
Posted by: Arielly Borges | 08/25/2019 at 12:17 PM
I believe that its okay to use a gender when referring to someone while writing. In all honestly I don't think it matters whether its used while writing to a group of people whereas when your writing to a specific person. Using a gender can be a way of formality or understanding for some writers and I completely understand where the confusion is coming from. Although, there are also many other ways to begin writing to someone so using a gender isn't really mandatory or needed if it's such a big deal.You can also use gender neutral phrases so no one gets offended or no misunderstandings don't occur.
Posted by: Fartun Hussein | 09/23/2019 at 08:53 PM
After reading this article, I agree that using a gender identity, like "sir," to address someone is a traditional term that should not be banned because some people get offended. The term "sir" makes it clear to the reader that the writer is showing respect towards them. If writers end up not addressing the gender of a person then the reader may get confused and/or lose interest in the work of art. However, when the writer is writing to someone that they do not know the gender to, it would be in their best interest to use, "To whom it may concern," because you do not want to address a female as a male, or vise versa.
Posted by: Hope | 09/23/2019 at 10:15 PM
“While I am by no means a feminist, I can’t believe it is necessary to maintain such a practice when other papers have eradicated this sexist attitude.” OK....... There are masculine and feminine words, and I fully support the ability for one to choose what or whom they identify as. However, there shouldn’t be eradication of a word that has a feminine equal. What happened to madame? I feel that this article is just attacking what they feel and completely overlooking the reverse. There are also other purposeful and useful ways of addressing someone without assuming gender: “To Whom it May Concern” “Superior” “Professor” “Teacher” “Employer” (etc.).
Posted by: Daysha | 09/26/2019 at 01:31 PM
I do not agree, I could say the title is merely respected though I feel that is a given. You could say "to whom it may concern" that seems to remove the care and concern factor. Now if you are fully aware to whom you are addressing using a separate form seems acceptable; although I can see where the issue arises. Avoidance of offense based on ignorance regarding gender seems lazy and almost unprofessional. I feel gender should not play a role in a written ledger its purpose is to inform or share information. Catering to pronouns is not a well-driven agenda. Respect does not equal to avoidance of improper gender pronouns or whether a material containing information leans more to the masculine side versus femininity.
Posted by: Jesse Greer | 06/14/2020 at 10:52 PM
While I would love to be referred to as female and use word toward me as a female. However, a lot would not like to be referred to as a feminist or a masculine. In the case of writing a response to someone, it is respectfully to show respect and use words such as sir, madam, etc.. However, a lot would not prefer these terms. A lot, dislike these terms as masculine and feminist. One may not consider themself as either. Therefore, one should use other terms to show respect. Also, using gender identities make it more clear to the reader. Overall, I do believe that using gender identity a respectful way to use in a writing. However, if you are not sure of the person's identity you should use other identities to show respect to the person.
Posted by: Tiba Kadhim | 09/27/2020 at 12:43 PM
I am a male and like people o referred to me as a male so sir going to to be fined, but just in case you are addressing a letter to an unknown person I think it best to say Dear Sir\ Madam is the appropriate and most respectful way to address an unknown person, but I prefer to just say " To whom a may concern" is another easy way to avoid gender issues. I think we as a society need to use appropriate terms to show respect to others.
Posted by: Morris Dweh | 02/16/2021 at 09:20 PM
I do think some people tend over think simple acts of respect. I do not see the harm in addressing the author of a column with “Sir” in a letter. After all The Henley Standards editor is in fact a gentleman. As you can see the resident that has an objection is in fact a female. As a matter of respect I would reply “Madame” in a response if I were writing her back or may use Ms. as I do not know if she is married. These forms of address have been used as a sign of respect for decades.
If I were receiving/or sending letters and did not know the gender of the person receiving then the appropriate response in my opinion would be “To Whom It May Concern”. It was how I was taught to address those whom I did not know. It is formal and shows respect. I definitely would use “Sir” or “Madame” if i new the persons biological make-up. I don’t believe in addressing by first names if the person as not been formally introduced prior. Really if we filter out greetings in everything we might as well just text every communication and forgo all forms of formality and respect.
Posted by: David Orosco | 02/21/2021 at 09:33 PM
I see people over step when it comes to simple respect about using the right pronouns for people. When writing a letter you need to make sure you know who you're writing to such as a sir or ma'am. The nature of using these pronouns are seen as a respect thing over the years to speak to someone you do not know. If you are unsure of someone's gender how ever you would write the address to be respectful not to assume such as write "To the author of __". You would do this out of respect. If you know the persons last name you should address them by such last name as a sign of respect and to avoid assuming gender or anything of the such. You could do this by saying Dear "last name" then write the letter.
Posted by: David Marlin | 09/20/2021 at 07:38 PM
Using the right pronouns when it comes to talking to people is very important. it shows them respect. In my opinion I think that people should start off as "to whom it may concern" or "dear (their name)" if they don't know if a person is a male or female. Also these greetings are informal and shouldn't offend any one in any way. If you know if their a man or female you can say ms. mrs. if they prefer to be called that.
Posted by: hanna montgomery | 09/22/2021 at 10:29 PM
In my opinion I think it would have been better to use "To whom this may concern" because it would have been more respectful in a way instead of saying "Dear Sir or Madam". I feel its important to consider the next person feelings just because you wouldn't know how it would make them feel by using the wrong pronouns.
Posted by: Myiesha | 09/23/2021 at 04:06 PM