« Coach wears high heels: Pau Gasol on gender and the NBA | Main | It does grow on trees: Comfort Azubuko on food forests in public space »

06/04/2018

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Malia Naumchik

I agree with Patel's conclusion that a successful doctor needs development and education in the area of humanities on top of their medical school requirements. Patel majored in philosophy before entering medical school, and believes that experience helped her develop skills other medical students might have struggled with. She states that doctors need to utilize empathy and critical thinking and also become more emotionally and culturally aware. I believe that these qualities are important for doctors because their field of work is rooted in both science and personal relationships. Many doctors enter medical school because they are fascinated with science and the inner workings of the body. Although these doctors might be very knowledgeable, they may be more suited towards working in research. As Patel mentions, doctors experience "physical fatigue, emotional exhaustion, and cognitive weariness." The heavy emotional tolls placed on doctors will break down even the wisest of scientists if they have not become comfortable with opening their hearts and minds through studies in the humanities. Although Patel discussed her personal experience of the benefits of studying humanities, I think her argument would have benefited from examples of the struggles of medical students who had not taken these courses. In her last paragraph, she mentions the "increasing dissatisfaction within the medical profession...". I think that if she had found a way to correlate that statement to real life example, the detrimental effects of not taking humanities classes would be more pronounced.

Cayla Fowler

I agree with Patel, to be a good doctor one must be able to show compassion and empathy.To open her essay Patel began with telling her readers about her own experience with death and how she felt about the subject in doing so she made her argument more persuasive in my own opinion. Her main argument in the article is that students with a humanities background have a greater potential to make better doctors than those students who simply have a science background, when I first read this I was skeptical, but after Patel provided the evidence for her argument I couldn't help but think she had made a good point. Although I understood Patel's argument that students with a humanities background could make better doctors than students with a science background, I still can't help but question her point.

Tiana Rutledge

I believe that Patel understands the importance of compassion as well as having the proper training. It is important and comforting to know that our doctors are diverse and knowledgeable in their field. Patel expresses the importance of
what represents a good doctor. During the early stage of her career she discussed her experience with losing a child patient
which was her first time witnessing death. Her earlier experiences further validates her point on the importance of having a thouhtful and diverse doctor. Patel thoroughly explained when asked what is considered acceptable when you experience the death of a patient. Patel explains that it is just as important to have kind characterstics as well as being proficiently trained. Patel's experience persuaded me when she discussed witnessing death for the first time and feeling just as much pain as the parents.

Brandon Steven

Yes of course! Doctors need to be trained perfectly. This post sounds very useful for medical students. I would like to this shared post with my doctors friends.

Autumn Hall

I agree with everything Patel had to say. To be a good doctor you not only have to have the smarts but you also need to have a good manor when difficult events arise. I think that doctors need to find the perfect balance between compassion and not being to attached to their patients. I know it is important for doctors to know all their facts and anatomy but Patel makes a good point that when becoming a doctor you should take humanities course. This would help students learn in some way how to take better care of a patient.

Hallie Enos

Dr. Patel argues a great point, that doctors shouldn't be just science and facts with patients, they should show emotion with them.Despite knowing the hardships of the emotions with some patients, Dr.Patel still feels strong about her point made. She wants patients to know she cares and is compassionate, but at the same time let them know she is aware of everything medically going on in a more professional stance.As a student in the medical field, this was interesting and helped me think about her point/argument.

Nathan Bailey

Dr. Patel was very persuading and confident in what she is saying. I agree that learning humanities at the early stages of college would be very beneficial. I think it can improve the doctor's interaction with their patients. It would help them to be more compassionate, yet professional in a way that is respectable. This article has opened my eyes to what happens in the medical field and this will help me to gain that patient to medical personnel relationship. Doctors are seeing their patients at their absolute worst and knowing how to property treat them while being compassionate is the perfect care procedure.

Isabella R

I agree and see the benefits of taking a humanities as a major, minor or just taking some classes to help serve yourself and patients when working in hospitals or clinics. I could also see how others could debate on other majors or other paths to help serve and get into the medical field. I really liked your article and it let me see how humanities could help me with my career choice.

Munsif Chaudhry

Dr.Patel offers many reasons on why aspiring physicians need to be taught the humanities. One way would be that it helps students to develop critical thinking skills, understand a variety of viewpoints from different cultures, build empathy, and become wise about emotions such as grief and loss. These characteristics define a good doctor. Her argument is persuasive because doctors don't only need to know about medical science but the social and cultural context to implement better care towards patients.

Jack Caulfield

I totally agree with Patel, that humanities should be a big part of every good doctor's education. I understand why many doctors would rather the path of a science only background to become masters of their trade. However, Patel explains that there is a study proving humanities is just as good at preparing up and coming doctors. She also explains that education of humanities negates negative traits seen in many physicians so my obvious choice would be a broader skill set in humanities. As a patient, I always go back to the doctor who try especially hard to understand what my issue is. People are fragile and complicated both physically but even more so mentally. A profession where the lives and well beings of people (with loved ones) are your responsibility should include an increased sense of empathy and tolerance of the unordinary for the benefit of the patient. Doctors shouldn't have to take humanities, but all who desire to be especially good should.

Miguel Suarez

I strongly agree with the points Dr. Patel had and the reason for why it is important for doctors to have good skills in humanities. Patel started by sharing her first time experiencing death as a medical student and how she felt empathy this patient and other patients later in her career. As a philosophy major, Patel realizes that in order to be a good doctor, a person not only needs to be good with the scientific aspect of the career, but they also need to have good humanities skills. As stated by Patel, studies show that students that have humanities backgrounds perform as well as students with science backgrounds in medical school. This shows the earlier students are exposed to humanities, the better off they will be in the future. It is also important to be exposed to humanities earlier because people learn to deal with situations through experience; therefore, it is better for students to know how to deal with certain situations correctly as early as possible. I believe Patel had a good argument and she supported it well by sharing personal experiences and citing different studies.

Kimberly Shu

I believe that Dr. Patel has many valid points on why it is important for current/ future doctors, or anyone thinking about going into the medical field to not only have a strong background in science, but to also have a solid foundation in humanities. Choosing to work in the medical field is not for the faint of heart. In order to perform at the highest level an individual is capable of in diagnosing, treating, and deciphering the course of action on a daily basis will require personal endurance, intelligence, communication, passion, and an impeccable work ethic. For most students who are interested in a career in medicine, it is important to know that this type of field work not only requires “book-smarts” to successfully navigate through diverse patient care regimes, but it challenges an individual to relate to others on a humane level with a sense of compassion, ambiguity, and having strong morals as a few characteristics of a good doctor according to Dr. Patel. I can agree with Dr. Patel about putting more emphasis on humanities as apart of an undergraduate’s curriculum. As we move forward with our college career, students hoping to work in this type of field must learn to train themselves to be able to critically assess different situations, communicate with others inside and outside of the medical field, and become a source of strength for patients who are especially going through tough times, as we more often then not look towards doctors as a source for answers to our medical issues.

ShengZhou

I believe that studying humanities will improve medical training. Humanities teach students to learn general knowledge and intellectual skills. Humanities include critical thinking and social skills. Critical thinking is an important skill for thinking. Social skills are an important communication. These will prove doctors’ understanding and empathy. First, critical thinking is an important skill for medical training. Critical thinking is a thinking skill. Critical thinking is thinking over and thinking clear. Critical thinker use applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating to understand true issues or the core of the problems. Then, they use observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, and communication to make actions for solving the issues. However, understand other’s view, respect a different culture, think with justice, and intellectual empathy is a critical thinking process. These are important for a doctor. A doctor controls the patients’ treatment. In the treatment, how to communicate with patients and patients’ relative are significant for doctors’ duty. The communication is a social skill, and critical thinking will help doctors to understand social skill. Second, the most famous universities agree with humanities is a necessary subject for the medicine. The universities include Stanford University, Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, the University of California–San Francisco, and King's College London. The most famous universities always represent the future medicinal technology. They lead medicine development and train top medicinal scientists. Their idea influences the world medicine. Also, most time, their judgments determine the world future destination. Therefore, people have a reason to believe the most famous universities’ judgment, humanity is a necessary subject for the medicine. Moreover, Patel’s example is a great example because the example proves humanities are important for a doctor. Patel’s three stages, which is as a medical student, as a doctor in training, and as a doctor in charge, use humanities to improve his medical training so he understands humanities is a significant subject for the medical training.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About They Say / I Blog

  • New readings posted monthly, on the same issues that are covered in “They Say / I Say” with Readings—and with a space where readers can comment, and join the conversation.

Become a Fan