Organic food. Do those words invoke images of a hand holding a spoon over a steaming bowl or a hand holding a shovel over a fertile mound of dirt? We’re guessing that your immediate association is with the food, but what about the farming? In this October 2015 Medium post, originally published in the Des Moines Register, food writers and activists Maria Rodale and Kimbal Musk focus on some of the challenges and obstacles faced by farmers who want to grow organically.
Read it here: Rodale and Musk, “Lost in transition: the path to organic”
- With the long-term advantages of organic farming so clear and well demonstrated, it might seem odd that more farmers aren’t changing their operations. How do Rodale and Musk explain what’s going on? What do they propose to help the transition? Do you think their proposal would work? Why or why not?
- Rodale and Musk mention the restaurant chain Chipotle. How well does the example of Chipotle advance their argument? Why? Why might they have chosen to mention that Musk serves on the Chipotle board of directors? Does mentioning Musk’s position with Chipotle damage the authors’ credibility? Why or why not?
- Rodale and Musk’s essay, like many published works, has two authors; however, in contrast with many other such works, their essay includes some first-person observations along with references to one or another of the essay’s authors. How well do Rodale and Musk present their individual and collaborative selves? Why do you think so? Are they able to avoid confusion? Why or why not?
- Read (or re-read) Steven Shapin’s essay in Chapter 18 of your text. Shapin is addressing consumers’ interests, and Rodale and Musk address the production side, but where do the two essays’ arguments coincide? Are there any points on which they clearly disagree? How might Rodale and Musk respond to Shapin’s essay? Point to specific passages from each essay to support your conclusions.
- You may not come from a farm family, but we’re 100% certain that farming and farm policy affect you personally. How do we know? Because you eat food. Every day. Rodale and Musk identify numerous economic and social sectors that would stand to benefit if more farmers could transition to organic production; these include banks and other lenders, food companies, distribution companies, public health agencies, and more. Choose one of these sectors and write a letter that argues for or against the program that Rodale and Musk are proposing, using their article as your They Say.
I truly enjoyed the post from Rodale and Musk. Coming from a farming state like Virginia, I am very familiar with the subject. Much of my family loves the farming life. Fortunately for us it is a much more an enjoyable experience since we are farming for ourselves instead of the public on a large scale. After reading the post I definitely have a better understanding as to why it is just so difficult to grow organically.
In reference to question 1, Rodale and Musk explain that the biggest obstacle for farmers is having the banks back them up, support and finance them. The three-year transition period to organic production is hard and largely expensive. If banks do not see other farmers transition successfully they are not willing to fund the process. Rodale and Musk propose that a program be set up that helps farmers by educating and financing them.
I think that Rodale and Musk’s proposal could work because there are so many positive and rewarding factors when farming organically for both the environment and for business. I find it sad that the banks are not seeing it that way. If banks could focus on the long run instead of right now, I’m sure farmers would have a better chance getting their support. Maybe banks should think about what food they prefer eating or feeding their family. I’m sure the healthier version is much appetizing.
Posted by: Erica Sproles | 04/20/2016 at 05:10 PM
I am also one of those people that believe and all the benefits that organic farming would bring to the country in so many different levels. So, I thought what is every farmer waiting for? I didn't realize all the complexity of the transition. I loved this article by Rodale and Musk. They do a great job in explaining the difficulties for farmers to make the transition and also offer a great solution. It would take everyone interested in the organic movement not only the farmers in petitioning these new policies to take place.
Posted by: Cozeth Valencia | 04/25/2016 at 09:49 AM
Before reading this article, I wasn’t so sure on the topic of either the production of organic foods or the food itself. I began reading and realized that the organic food production in our country is in consumer demand but it exceeds our supply. The organic food sector is a 39.1 billion dollar market with an annual growth rate of 10 percent(the fastest-growing sector of the food industry)(Medium). Due to our limited supply of organic food production, American food companies and supermarkets attempt these demands but look closely at suppliers overseas.
Are and should the farmers resist becoming organic farmers? Personally, I believe farmers should consider taking action into becoming organic because of our low supply and demand. With the organic sector being the fastest growing , this should spark an interest in farmers. The annual output and productivity holds as a positive and successful business model. Businesses who are in demand for these organics search for farmers who demonstrate a consistent farm that’s reliable. Even though the labor costs increase, the chemical inputs decrease and leaves farmers earning more or a “premium” when they sell certified organic crops. The other upside for organic farmers is that they are viewed as supporters of healthier soil which produces positive health for people. According to a recent white paper published by the Rodale Institute, regenerative methods of organic agriculture can sequester carbon emissions, thereby helping to reduce the greenhouse effect(Medium). In the article, the author displays his travels with a board member of Chipotle, Kimbal Musk. They venture to Iowa trying to learn about farmers’ decisions on shifting to organic. The team visited conventional and organic farmers as well as a farm conference. During their visit with farmers, they studied the stories on whether or not they believe that organic is better. To their findings , it’s not relevant to which farmers are organic or not. Conventional farmers have subsidies by the government and crop insurance that backs up their risks and support them in difficult. Conventional farmers lack the support and risk management for the 3 year transition period that is required for organic certification, which cannot capture the value of an organic price. The team learned from talking to farmers is that banks are unlikely to support a farmer’s transition unless they have seen another client transition successfully. The United States is starting to see some momentum on this front, as organizations like California Certified Organic Farmers have launched support programs(Medium). Farmers who transition aren’t just facing a new set of certifications, for they are also facing new types of financing, distribution methods, and ways of thinking about their farm. The author concludes the article believing in his statement that it’s time for the USDA to help farmers transition into the organic program that would support, incentivize, and train conventional farmers to become organic farmers during the three years it takes to become certified.
Posted by: Tyler Biggs | 09/25/2016 at 12:21 PM
Good information.
Posted by: Magdalene Mwangi | 06/29/2017 at 05:31 AM
Sound reasoning
Posted by: Martin Buuri Kaburia | 10/01/2017 at 09:10 AM
Honestly, I really do appreciate the subject because it helps the environment growing healthier and the benefits of getting more better environment by providing the organic foods that reflect on our body health and our children .I believe it's better for funding and I truly hope the banks help the environment and farmers life
Posted by: ALI | 10/25/2017 at 02:29 AM